Evid3nc3 Great explanation. Remember: most atheists are consciously or unconsciously Agnostic Atheists. The terms are not mutually exclusive:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-BQVmvulmQ
Glaucio Alves That's
a very acurate and helpful piece of information from you. I used to get confused
sometimes when thinking about what definition would best suit my way of
seeing that all. But reading about the teapot metaphor from Bertrand
Russel some years ago, I agreed that it was impossible to prove that a
theistic god doesn't exist - the same for centaurs, elves, fairies etc.
And yet it would be unreasonable to believe in this God due to lack of
convincing evidence to it. It was Occam's razor principle already
working in the back of my mind, though I'd never heard about it before
watching your videos. I began to define myself as an agnostic since
then, for I defectively reasoned that being atheist was the same as
being "absolutely sure about the non-existence of a God" - as if it were
scientifically verified with the technology we currently have. Now on
seeing the video you just sent, I don't feel inadequate to call myself
an atheist anymore. Interesting reasoning... I am an atheist (under the
agnostic poing of view). An Atheist. Sounds good to me. It just came to
me the guess that there are lots of atheists out there who'll never be
conscious that this definition suits them perfectly.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário